Yelp Asks California High Court to Slap Down Restaurateur’s Suit Over Review Filter | Thomson Reuters Blog

Yelp’s statements to consumers about the accuracy of its review-filter software are protected speech, the website operator has told the California Supreme Court.

In an Aug. 28 petition for review, Yelp urges the high court to overturn a recent appeals court decision allowing restaurateur James Demetriades to proceed with his false-advertising suit against the site.  The company says the state’s anti-SLAPP statute protects Yelp’s statements about the review filter.

Source:  Thomson Reuters

I discussed this case at length in the 10th episode of the California SLAPP Law Podcast. The tables have been turned on Yelp. After suing one law firm for alleged fake reviews, this plaintiff is suing Yelp for fake reviews about itself. Yelp claims that its reviews are trustworthy, despite all evidence to the contrary.

Nonetheless, it pursued an anti-SLAPP motion against this claim for false advertising, and lost. It is now appealing that loss to the California Supreme Court.


Leave a Reply

Aaron Morris, Attorney
Aaron Morris
Morris & Stone, LLP

Orchard Technology Park
11 Orchard Road, Suite 106
Lake Forest, CA 92630

(714) 954-0700

Email Aaron Morris
Information Helpful?
Buy me coffee
SLAPP Law Podcast

Click "Amazon Music" for all episodes of California SLAPP Law Podcast


NOTICE PURSUANT TO BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE SECTION 6158.3: The outcome of any case will depend on the facts specific to that case. Nothing contained in any portion of this web site should be taken as a representation of how your particular case would be concluded, or even that a case with similar facts will have a similar result. The result of any case discussed herein was dependent on the facts of that case, and the results will differ if based on different facts.

This site seeks to present legal issues in a hopefully entertaining manner. Hyperbolic language should not be taken literally. For example, if I refer to myself as the “Sultan of SLAPP” or the “Pharaoh of Free Speech,” it should not be assumed that I am actually a Sultan or a Pharaoh.

Factual summaries are entirely accurate in the sense of establishing the legal scenario, but are changed as necessary to protect the privacy of the clients.